Jump to content

Talk:Jeffrey Dahmer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeJeffrey Dahmer was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 22, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 22, 2004, July 22, 2012, July 22, 2016, and July 22, 2021.

Slayer song 213

[edit]

You haven’t referenced the Slayer song 213. 148.252.146.132 (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Am guessing you mean this one. But it's mentioned only obliquely at the Slayer article? Do you have any sources that detail the connection/ inspiration? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grandmother's death addition to article?

[edit]

Good morning everyone, I hope you're all fine.

Do you think that, given his grandmother's importance in his life and involvement (unwilling and unknown to her) in his crimes, we should add her death of December 1992 to the article? I mean, in addition to the information about his parents.

Thank you, and I am okay with whatever opinion. :-) CoryGlee (talk) 12:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: I once asked about it and there was some opposition, but as times changed with the coverage of his father's death, I think that opinion could have also changed. Thanks a lot. CoryGlee (talk) 12:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Sex offender" -> "rapist" in the lead

[edit]

Can we change the title of "sex offender", in the lead, to "rapist" or "serial rapist"? It's less vague and describes more precisely the crimes other than murder that he was convicted for. I don't see that many sources predominantly describing him as a "sex offender". Badbluebus (talk) 02:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article describes what he was convicted for. He was a convicted sex offender in a 1989 trial. He was never tried and convicted for rape. CJC-DI (talk) 08:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Dahmer: Uncovering The Case For Innocence. ISBN 1917525036

[edit]

New book exposes the truth about this decades-old story. Penned by a former police officer turned expert fraud investigator, the author applies his unparalleled skills in uncovering deception to the Dahmer story. Focussing on forensic analysis, psychological profiling, and media scrutiny, the author uncovers new insights that challenge conventional wisdom and the narrative perpetuated by mainstream media about this killer of seventeen young men and boys.

Far from yet another exploration of Jeffrey Dahmer—the author delivers an investigation into the story behind the story and invites readers to confront the complexities of the case. Was everything as clear-cut as we were led to believe, or does a deeper, untold version of events exist? SEEIT750 (talk) 15:10, 2 February 2025 (UTC) SEEIT750 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Apparently by R.J. Sykes, a former police officer turned expert fraud investigator and published in December 2024. Is it any good? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes its well worth a read, its had some good reviews already. It's over 550 pages, so lots to read and its all cited, fully referenced. SEEIT750 (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)SEEIT750 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
You might want to add links to those reviews here, to support any mention of the book in the article. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure - they can be found on Amazon and NetGalley, but here's the links:
Jeffrey Dahmer: Uncovering the Case for Innocence eBook : Sykes, R.J.: Amazon.co.uk: Kindle Store
Jeffrey Dahmer | R. J. Sykes | 9781917525039 | NetGalley SEEIT750 (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)SEEIT750 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
There's also on Goodreads: Jeffrey Dahmer - Uncovering the Case for Innocence by RJ Sykes | Goodreads SEEIT750 (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2025 (UTC)SEEIT750 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Any professional reviews in WP:RS sources? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - it's not on Wiki yet as its still early days, it's only been published in the past few weeks. But NetGalley is an industry platform open to the media, and it's also also the public, for those who want to review books and advocate literacy. Not sure if the reviews on there have been left by journalists. The publisher itself is reputable, which is always a positive sign and adds credibility, since they put their name to it. In time, as it gains more attention, there will be more reviews also, so it can be added to Wikipedia. SEEIT750 (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)SEEIT750 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The publisher is Shieldcrest Publishing, of which I have had no prior knowledge. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I checked them out, they are the top UK indie publisher and part of the traditional publishing house Pressman House. SEEIT750 (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)SEEIT750 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Hi, SEEIT750! Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum. That is, all on-wiki discussion should be focused on improving the Wikipedia. At present, this post reads like an advertisement for a book related to this subject, which is not acceptable. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of those three (Amazon, Goodreads or NetGalley) is a reliable source, least of all Amazon. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:50, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]